Approved-online-essay-writers

US Supreme Court

Week 4 Discussion 2: US Supreme Court

25 unread replies. 76 replies.

Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Note: Our papers are 100% human-written, not AI-generated. 

We Write Essays for Students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Get Help Now!

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 11, 12, 13
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source

Initial Post Instructions
Using the Supreme Court’s website, research one case that deals with a contentious issue of your choice. (These issues can be racial discrimination, right to bear arms, same-sex marriage, hate speech, suicide, etc.) After finding a case, describe the Constitutional issue at the heart of the case. Summarize the points, the opinion, and at least one dissent used to come up with their conclusions. Did you agree with the majority opinion or the dissent?

US Supreme Course Case Search Job Aid (Links to an external site.)

Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.

Writing Requirements

  • Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-up)
  • APA format for in-text citations and list of references

Grading
This activity will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric. Please review the following link:

  • Link (webpage): Discussion Guidelines
Discussion Grading Rubric – 25 pts
You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Discussion Grading Rubric – 25 pts
Criteria Ratings Pts
Initial Post Content

7.0 pts

Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.

5.0 pts

Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.

3.0 pts

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.

0.0 pts

Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).
7.0 pts
Initial Post Evidence & Sources

4.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.

3.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons. Sources are credited.

2.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.

0.0 pts

Does not integrate any evidence.
4.0 pts
Follow-Up Post 1

4.0 pts

Response furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

3.0 pts

Response furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

2.0 pts

Response does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion.

0.0 pts

Does not respond to another student or instructor.
4.0 pts
Follow-Up Post 2

4.0 pts

Response furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

3.0 pts

Response furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

2.0 pts

Response does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion.

0.0 pts

Does not respond to another student or instructor.
4.0 pts
Professional Communication

4.0 pts

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

3.0 pts

Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

2.0 pts

Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

0.0 pts

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
4.0 pts
Timeliness of Responses

1.0 pts

Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.

0.0 pts

Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
1.0 pts
Frequency of Responses

1.0 pts

Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0.0 pts

Posts fewer than two different days OR does not participate at all.
1.0 pts
Total Points: 25.0

 

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NERDY ASSIGNMENT HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT



The post US Supreme Court appeared first on Nerdy Assignment Help.

Welcome to originalessaywriters.com, our friendly and experienced essay writers are available 24/7 to complete all your assignments. We offer high-quality academic essays written from scratch to guarantee top grades to all students. All our papers are 100% plagiarism-free and come with a plagiarism report, upon request

Tell Us “Write My Essay for Me” and Relax! You will get an original essay well before your submission deadline.

PLACE YOUR ORDER