The notion that dependency elicits helping behavior in the Berkowitz type of situation has not received full support from other studies (outlined in Table 4). Schopler and Bateson (1965, Experiment 2 and 3) and Schopler (1967) found that females yielded more money to a partner when he was in a state of high (versus low) dependency, but only if the cost of yielding was low.
Males in the low cost of yielding condition, on the other hand, yielded more money when their partner was in a state of low dependency. In a different situation, Schopler and Bateson (1965, Experiment 1) found that although females were more inclined to volunteer to help a student finish his thesis when he was “desperate,” males were more inclined to help when he had a year to work on it (p < .10). The measure of altruism in the Schopler studies seems more powerful than that in the Berkowitz studies because of the material sacrifice involved. The more the benefactor yielded, the less he kept for himself.
We Write Essays for Students
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper
Get Help Now!Other studies which involved a variety of situations, though, have supplied support for the notion that dependency in the recipient elicits altruism. Wheeler and Wagner (1968), for example, found that Navy men were more likely to donate money when they were exposed to a personal appeal which involved a highly dependent family than one which involved a condition of low dependency (p < .10). A study by Test and Bryan (in press) failed to find an effect for dependency. A posttest questionnaire, however, revealed that the dependency manipulation had failed. In a situation similar to that of Test and Bryan, Midlarsky (1968a) found that more help was given to a partner with broken eyeglasses than to a less dependent recipient, even though helping involved the receipt of electric shocks.
It should be pointed out that the dependency manipulations in the Schopler and Bateson (1965), Wheeler and Wagner (1968), Test and Bryan (in press), and Midlarsky (1968a) studies differed from those in the Berkowitz studies. In the Berkowitz studies the supervisor was specifically dependent on the worker—if the worker did not work hard, the supervisor did not get rewarded. In the Schopler and Bateson (1965, Experiment 1) and Wheeler and Wagner (1968) studies, on the other hand, the dependency of the other was general—each subject could have told himself that if he did not help, someone else would. The Midlarsky (1968a) and Test and Bryan (in press) studies fall in between. Subjects were not asked to help the dependent other, but they were the only ones who could help him.
Before turning to studies which manipulated interpersonal attractiveness of the recipient, it should be mentioned that dependency need not be viewed as a unitary variable. Studies by Schopler and Matthews (1965) and Horowitz (1968) demonstrated that internally caused dependency (dependency caused by the subject) tended to elicit less altruism than externally caused dependency. Locus of dependency, though, seems best examined as a trait variable.
[sg_popup id=2]
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING HOMEWORK HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
The post The notion that dependency elicits helping behavior in the Berkowitz type of situation has not received full support from other studies (outlined in Table 4). Schopler and Bateson (1965, Experiment 2 and 3) and Schopler (1967) found that females yielded more money to a partner when he was in a state of high (versus low) dependency, but only if the cost of yielding was low. appeared first on My Nursing Papers.
Welcome to originalessaywriters.com, our friendly and experienced essay writers are available 24/7 to complete all your assignments. We offer high-quality academic essays written from scratch to guarantee top grades to all students. All our papers are 100% plagiarism-free and come with a plagiarism report, upon request
Tell Us “Write My Essay for Me” and Relax! You will get an original essay well before your submission deadline.
