We Write Essays for Students
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper
Get Help Now!Across decades, Israel has engaged in a largely destructive and unending conflict with its Arab neighbors. Dominant scholars have presented an array of explanations and theoretical analyses in attempts to attain sufficient understanding on the issue. The multidimensional and complexity of the unending conflict may be interpreted by Classical Realism, an International Relations theory that is considered to be one of the most important and useful theoretical models for explaining outbreaks of inter-state conflicts, (Schweller, 1994). It is imperative to note that realism is represented by different strands ranging from structural to classical realism though classical realism offers the best interpretation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Israel as a nation existed out of the will of collective individuals and their desire to establish a Zionist state. Recent developments and conflict is a reflection of its desire to gain considerable proportion of military and economic power; which offers necessary security for its existence. In line with classical realism, Israeli conflict seeks to protect the interest of its citizens hence have continued to insist that the Palestinian Hamas government recognize it as a state, a demand often interpreted as manipulative and attempts to sabotage any probable negotiations that would give the Palestinian states considerable autonomy, (Marquardt, 2007).
Classical realism has been faltered for being one sided and offering analyses based on material gains rather than ideation, (Randall, 2003). Although scholars have attributed the conflict to varying reasons, it is evident that the desire to protect the interest of its individual members coupled with the interest of its alliances has pushed it to engage in the much criticized conflict. Classical realists are supportive of the creation of democratic space, the true avenue for economic development, (Vasquez, 1983), yet Israel still holds Palestine hostage, only seeking to protect the interest of its citizens. Israel continues to whither its strength accusing Palestinian authorities of being obstacles to progress by refusing to recognize it as a state. The right of existence by the Jewish state is continuously put to question since the land in which it occupies belonged to Palestinians prior to 1948.
Much understanding may be attained by analyzing the Israeli conflict via the realist or quasi-realist terms. The idea of balance of power is central to realist discourse hence the Israeli conflict may be understood as inevitable due to the existence of disequilibrium of power within the region. The Israeli factually hold the power within the Middle East gaining much support from its allies such as the United States. The realists assertion that equal distribution of power may be conducive to peace is challenged within the middle East where scholars assert that equal distribution of power would create instability rather than stability, (Marquardt, 2007).
Conclusively, an indeterminate number of logical evidences and explanations may not offer a critical understanding of the conflict hence inevitably; the realist perspective offers a rather balanced approach with its basic premises being logically acceptable. Specific responses are consequent to realist interpretation of the power transition. In attempt to bandwagon and engage in buck-passing, several strategies inclusive of appeasement, isolation, supporting the aggressor and balancing against the aggressor have been evident, (Said, 2000), strategies outlined under classical realism. More dominantly, states engaged in the conflict continue to engage in buck-passing and by extension bandwagoning with their respective aggressors. Additionally, realism has served to anticipate and uncover the real motives behind a majority of Israel’s foreign polities and actions, feats that Idealism may never uncover.
References
Marquardt, P. (2007) Realism and Israel’s Right to Exist Retrieved, March, 6th, 2009 from:
http://web.israelinsider.com/Views/10794.htm
Randall L. S. (2003) The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. pp. 311-347 in Colin E. &
Miriam F. E. eds., Progress in International Relations Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Said, E. (2000). Israel Needs Realism to Find its Way in an Arab World. Los Angeles Times.
Retrieved, March, 6th, 2009 from:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/053100-103.htm
Schweller, R. L (1994). “Bandwagoning for Profit; Bringing the Revisionist State Back In.”
International Security, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 72-107. Retrieved, June, 25th, 2008 from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539149
Vasquez, J. A. (1983). The Power of Power Politics: A Critique. Rutgers University Press.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH GRADE VALLEY TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
The post Israel Power Transition through the Eyes of Realism appeared first on Grade Ninjas.
Welcome to originalessaywriters.com, our friendly and experienced essay writers are available 24/7 to complete all your assignments. We offer high-quality academic essays written from scratch to guarantee top grades to all students. All our papers are 100% plagiarism-free and come with a plagiarism report, upon request
Tell Us “Write My Essay for Me” and Relax! You will get an original essay well before your submission deadline.
