Approved-online-essay-writers

Explain why you believe these four inventions or contributions are the most useful inventions or contributions from the ancient Chinese.

contributions or inventions created by the ancient Chinese.
Paper instructions:
Read the topic carefully. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper (750-1000 words) that responds to each of the items described in the topic.
For the topic you choose:
Support your ideas with specific illustrative examples. If there are questions or points associated with your chosen topic be sure to answer all of the listed questions and address all of the items in that topic. If your topic requires you to do several things related to the topic be sure to do each of the things listed.
While some of the topics tend to lend themselves toward particular writing genres you are not restricted to the specific format suggested for the individual topic. For example you may do an interview a proposal a letter a short story a blog an essay an article or any other written genre for almost any of the topics. The project is intended to be fun as well as informative so feel free to be creative with the delivery of your information.
Use at least two (2) sources
Ancient Chinese Contributions. Essay. To win a trip to China you enter a contest to determine the four most useful contributions or inventions created by the ancient Chinese. (1) Identify eight to ten of these useful inventions or contributions. (2) Nominate four that you believe are the most ingenious or innovative. (3) Explain why you believe these four inventions or contributions are the most useful inventions or contributions from the ancient Chinese. (4) Identify one invention or contribution that you cannot live without and explain wh
INTRODUCTION
Historically gender differences have been at the core of social and economic injustice and women have faced fundamental disadvantages (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 351). Despite recent changes in formal equality the introduction of protection for women in the Constitution Act 1982 and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for example informal barriers are still present which lead to the discrimination of women (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 89). The Canadian education system has not been immune to the effects of discrimination towards women; in fact some argue that schools have been a vessel for inequality (Knudson-Martin & Mahoney 2009 p. 45). This paper will argue that discrimination toward women inpost-secondary education has led to social and economic inequality that reaches much further than just educational institutions. The first section of the paper will outline current scholarly literature on education and specifically gender inequality in universities. This paper will then discuss why gender inequality in schools and education is a social problem. Finally the essay will conclude with a discussion and commentary regarding the issue of social and economic inequality between genders as an educational system failure.
WHAT DO WE KNOW?
Many structural functionalistssuggest thateducation is a fundamental way that socialization occurs (Tepperman and Curtis 2001 p. 347). Furthermore that our society isobsessed with assigning social statuses to people based on their perceived level of success; this method of placing individuals or groups into social statuses is often referred to as ascribed status (Sasaki as cited inTepperman and Curtis 2011 p. 347). The emphasis placed on social status is reinforced by individuals desire to gain upward social mobility a process by which one moves up a perceived social or economic hierarchy in order to achieve a desired status in a meritocracy (holding power based on merit and not social status)(Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 347). The desire to gain upward social mobility has led to the belief that educational achievement will lead to increased social status (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 347). Structural functionalists argue that the function of schooling is to give people the desired human capital (in terms of abilities) in order to advance economic growth (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 361). Therefore many Canadians believe that receiving post-secondary education will lead to higher social mobility and thus increase their human capital which will enable individuals to reach a higher ascribed status.
The educational system also aims to sort individuals into distinct categories which send messages out to perspective employers regarding the individuals abilities; this approach is commonly referred to as signalling theory (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 349). Many scholars suggest that this may lead to economic inequality based on where an individual receives post-secondary education (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 349). For example men have dominated the fields of engineering and medicine and women tend to study education and nursing. Although many of these jobs require similar educational achievement education and nursing is not comparable to medicine and engineering in terms of financial reward (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 351). Connell (1996) argues that a symbolic structure in education is the gendering of knowledge which refers to teachers defining certain subjects or areas as masculine and others as feminine (Connell 1996 p. 214). Furthermore Connell argues that perceptions of masculine and feminine jobs are culturally defined and thus banning females from typically male dominated curriculum areas is a form of discrimination (Connell 1996 p. 217).
A result of sorting people into different categories is the division of individuals into two economic sectors: the primary labour market (high wage secure and highly skilled jobs) and the secondary labour market (low-paying generally unstable and unskilled jobs)(Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 350). The placement into each category is largely related to social traits backgrounds and abilities that have been achieved through formal post-secondary education (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 350). It is important to recognize that even in modern society women make up a large portion of the secondary labour market and therefore consistently earn less have less job security and face more inequality in hiring practices (Fausto-Sterling 1992 p. 5).
In 2008 Canadian women earned an average $30100 compared to $47000 earned by men (Williams 2010). On average women who have a post-secondary certificate or diploma earn 71.2% of what men with the same education earn (Williams 2010). Women who attain a university degree earn only 68.3% of what men with a university degree earn. Furthermore women who work full-time throughout the year earn on average $62800 while men earn an average of $91800 (Williams 2010). In comparing the earning ratio between men and women across distinct occupations women and men tend to have the least wage disparity in typically labeled feminine vocations such as: natural sciences (on average women earn 83.5% of mens wages) teaching (83%) artistic/recreational (85.4%) and clerical (81.5%); and the most wage disparity in: medicine/health (56.8%) manufacturing (55.7%) occupations unique to primary industry (49%) and government/religion/social sciences (49.8%)(Williams 2010).
GENDER BIAS IN POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION
The conflict theory approach suggests that the educational system services as a vessel of inequality based on class race and gender (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 362). An area that this theory may be placed emphatically is on the issue of gender inequality in the post-secondary educational system. Throughout Canadian history females have been marginalized in the educational system. For example before Confederation young girls attended school with boys but were often pulled out of school in order to fulfill familial duties (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 351). When these young women did attend school and show an interest in post-secondary education they were guided into fields such as nursing and education (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 351 &Macneill 2011). At one point in history women were completely banned form attending medical school (a typically male-dominated field) (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 351). Additionally many of the most highly skilled and well-paid jobs such as doctor and lawyer are still predominately held by males (Fausto-Sterling 1992 p. 5 &MacNeill 2011).
The discrimination of women in post-secondary education has had a direct influence on socioeconomic inequality between men and women. Banks (1988) argues that although the overt sexual discrimination against women in law schools is decreasing an even more damaging form of covert sexism and gender-bias remains (Banks 1988 p. 137). Throughout the 1970s law schools catered specifically to male students and any benefits to female students were considered secondary and unimportant (Banks 1988 p. 138). Additionally women tend to stay silent about inequality in law school because the law school classroom environment structure and language tend to exclude women or make them feel inferior (Banks 1988 p. 146). Banks (1988) suggests that this trend does not simply affect law school students but the covert sexism filters into the entire justice system (Banks 1988 p. 137). Sexism is a form of discrimination and thus sexism within the walls of our law schools may have a lasting affect on the individuals that enter the field of law. Therefore women who enter the field of law are faced with discrimination from all areas in the justice system that is dominated by males. As a result women are faced with discrimination in hiring practices less pay difficulty in promotion and an uncomfortable work environment.
Stratton et. al. (2005) suggest that a informal discrimination still exists within medical schools (Stratton et. al 2005 p. 402). This study found that women tend to think about discrimination and sexism before deciding on which medical specialization to enroll in (Stratton et. al. 2005 p. 403). Women tend to enroll in areas such as gynecology and obstetrics while men enroll in neurology and surgery (Stratton et. al. 2005 p. 405). The research reinforces the idea that discrimination against women may influence their decision in which field to study in post-secondary education and that women as informally pushed into areas which are culturally defined as feminine and do not provide equal economic gains (Stratton et. al. 2005 p. 402).
Although societal perceptions have changed over time historical stereotypes have reinforced the idea thatwomen should not achieve the same social and economic statuses as men.The issue of gender inequality in terms of social and economic status remains significantly influenced by achieved education level (Coulombe&Frenette 2007 p. 24). In a report released by Statistics Canada Coulombe and Frenette (2007) suggest that education level can almost fully explain the decline in economic inequality between genders since the 1980s (Coulombe&Frenette 2007 p. 24). This evolving trend indicates that education level is perhaps the most significant predictor of socioeconomic class. One may argue that this is a direct result of the formal changes made to protect womens rights in the Constitution Act 1982. It is important to acknowledge that since the Constitution Act 1982 there have been many changes to the way society perceives formal equality but informal barriers still remain for women. Although the Charter of Rights and Freedoms may formally protect women gender inequality remains permissive in our culture and therefore continues to make it difficult for females to achieve true equality. Until informal barriers such as discrimination social injustice and stereotypes are eliminated social and economic inequality will remain a significant issue for women.
The educational system is supposed to provide universal support and learning opportunities for all but it fails to provide for distinct issues relating to women. A cornerstone of our democratic society is that every individual regardless or race gender or class is afforded the same rights under and before the law(Constitution Act 1982). However this has not been the case for women who have faced discrimination in the educational system. Current research illustrates that as women gain equality in certain sectors of the job market those jobs decrease in prestige and pay (Tepperman& Curtis 2011 p. 353). Women who have fought gender stereotypes throughout their educational experience to break through the social construction of a typical male vocation are met with a decrease in the social status and pay of that particular job.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
It is important to note however that social and economic equality can be achieved however slow the process may be. In order to continue the trend of positive reinforcement for womens equality in the educational system and workforce we must continue to educate future generations and send the message that inequality and discrimination will not be tolerated. Our society is made up of discriminative images everywhere we look and thus we must start early in the developmental process ie. early elementary school in order to provide our future with the foundation for equality. We must also advance policy in regard to the equal treatment for women in post-secondary institutions as well as hiring practices.
This essay has examined the effect that the post-secondary educational system in Canada has had on social and economic inequality between males and females. Throughout history women have faced a constant struggle to receive equal education in comparison to men. At one time women were barred from attending highly skilled post-secondary institutions (such as medical schools). When women did receive higher education they were guided into typically feminine vocations such as nursing and education. Not only are these jobs perceived as overtly feminine but they are paid far less in comparison to typical male dominant jobs. Although recent trends have illustrated women are closing the gap in economic disparity this paper has argued that the gap remains pervasive because of a failed post-secondary educational system. This system has failed to provide equal rights and protections which are outlined in our Constitution. This failure has lead to a system where women still earn less than males and are disproportionately represented in unemployment and low socioeconomic statuses. Our educational system has failed to teach our younger generations that inequality and discrimination will not be tolerated. In order to make societal changes we must first educate our children to accept all human beings as equal.
REFERENCES
Banks T. L. (1988). Gender bias in the classroom. Journal of Legal Education 38(2) 137-146.
The Constitution Act 1982 being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK) 1982 c 11
Cool J. (2010). Wage Gap Between Women and Men. Ottawa: Library of Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2010-30-e.pdf
Connell R. W. (1996). Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity and gender studies for schools. Teachers College Record 98(2) 206- 235.
Coulombe S. Frenette M. (2007).Has Higher Education among Young Women Substantially Reduced the Gender Gap in Employment and Earnings?. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11f0019m/11f0019m2007301-eng.pdf
Fausto-Sterling A. (1992). Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men. New York NY: BasicBooks.
Fausto-Sterling A. (2009). Dueling dualisms. In A. L. Ferber K. Holcomb & T. Wentling Sex Gender & Sexuality (pp. 6-21). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Knudson-Martin C. & Mahoney A.R. (2009).Couples Gender and Power: Creating Change in Intimate Relationships. New York NY: Springer Publishing Company.
MacNeill T. (2011 November 23). Schools and education [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from University of Ontario Institute of Technology WebCT site: http://www.uoit.ca/connect
Stratton T.D. McLaughlin M.A. Witte F.M. Fosson S.E. & Nora L.M. (2005).Does students exposure to gender discrimination and sexual harassment in medical school affect specialty choice and residency program selection?.Academic Medicine 80(4) 400-408.
Tepperman& Curtis. (2011). Social Problems: A Canadian Perspective 3rd Edition. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Williams C. (2010). Economic Well Being: A Gender-based Statistical Report. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-503-x/2010001/article/11388-eng.pdf

We Write Essays for Students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper

Get Help Now!

 

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER AND GET HELP

Click the button below to order this paper AND ENJOY OUR DISCOUNT.

The post Explain why you believe these four inventions or contributions are the most useful inventions or contributions from the ancient Chinese. appeared first on Deliver My Assignment.

Welcome to originalessaywriters.com, our friendly and experienced essay writers are available 24/7 to complete all your assignments. We offer high-quality academic essays written from scratch to guarantee top grades to all students. All our papers are 100% plagiarism-free and come with a plagiarism report, upon request

Tell Us “Write My Essay for Me” and Relax! You will get an original essay well before your submission deadline.

PLACE YOUR ORDER