Review the Major Assignment 1: Developing a Research Topic for a Qualitative Study Assignment Overview and Guidelines for proper formatting of your paper.
Incorporate your Instructor’s feedback from week 4 Parts 1 and 2 submission. Please indicate the new material by highlighting the new or revised text in Parts 1 and 2.
Update your Annotated Bibliography to include any new articles you have read since Week 4 that would be appropriate to include.
Continue on to Part 3 and finalize this section for your final submission. Use the Detailed Major Assignment 1 Guidelines to format your paper.
We Write Essays for Students
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper
Get Help Now!Write a purpose statement using terminology of qualitative research. The purpose statement should contain:
A statement using the following template: The purpose of this qualitative study is to [choose one: explore, describe, understand, explain] the meaning/experience/culture/stories of [phenomenon of interest] in [population/setting].
A justification of why the purpose of your study is suited for the qualitative approach in terms of:
The phenomena you choose
The “fit” with a constructivist epistemology and ontology
The relevance of the naturalistic setting or context to the phenomena of interest
Based on your knowledge of reflexivity, explain your relationship to the problem; and the issues of bias and positionality to be addressed. Include a brief description of the setting and possible sources of data.
Write a research question using terminology of qualitative research. (Note: This could be the same research question you created in your Discussion 1 for this week ONLY if it applies to your topic of study for this Assignment.)
The research question should incorporate and mirror the purpose statement using the following template: What is the meaning/experience/culture/stories of [phenomenon of interest] in [population/setting]?
Include your updated Annotated Bibliography section.
Name: RSCH_8310_Week_8_Assignment_Rubric
Description: RSCH 7310 Week 8 Assignment Rubric – RSCH 7310 Week 8 Assignment Rubric
Rubric
Name: RSCH_8310_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric
Description: RSCH 7310 Assignment Week 4 Rubric – RSCH 6310 Assignment Week 4 Rubric
• Grid View
• List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Problem Statement Points Range: 50 (20%) – 60 (24%)
Paper includes a 1- to 2-paragraph problem statement generated from a gap in the scholarly research that clearly describes (a) the phenomena of interest, (b) a summary of key findings based on the three articles, and (c) a gap that should be addressed. Points Range: 39 (15.6%) – 49 (19.6%)
Paper includes a 1- to 2-paragraph problem statement generated from a gap in the scholarly research, but there may be missing or unclear information in one of the following domains: (a) the phenomena of interest, (b) a summary of the key findings, and/or (c) a gap that should be addressed. Points Range: 28 (11.2%) – 38 (15.2%)
Paper includes a 1- to 2-paragraph problem statement, but there may be missing or unclear information in two of the following domains: (a) the phenomena of interest, (b) a summary of the key findings, and/or (c) a gap that should be addressed. Points Range: 17 (6.8%) – 27 (10.8%)
Paper includes a problem statement, but the information within it is very unclear or is missing altogether in all three of the following domains: (a) the phenomena of interest, (b) a summary of the key findings, and/or (c) a gap that should be addressed.
Purpose Statement Points Range: 65 (26%) – 75 (30%)
Paper provides a clear purpose statement using the terminology of qualitative research. The purpose statement includes a strong, research-based justification for the study, including (a) the phenomena chosen, (b) the “fit” with a constructivist epistemology and ontology, (c) the relevance of the naturalistic setting or context to the phenomena of interest, (d) the researcher’s relationship to the problem and issues of bias and positionality, and (e) a brief description of the setting and possible sources of data. Points Range: 54 (21.6%) – 64 (25.6%)
Paper provides a purpose statement using the terminology of qualitative research. The purpose statement includes a research-based justification for the study, but there may be missing or unclear information in one of the following domains: (a) the phenomena chosen, (b) the “fit” with a constructivist epistemology and ontology, (c) the relevance of the naturalistic setting or context to the phenomena of interest, (d) the researcher’s relationship to the problem and issues of bias and positionality, and (e) a brief description of the setting and possible sources of data. Points Range: 43 (17.2%) – 53 (21.2%)
Paper provides a purpose statement, but is missing some of the terminology of qualitative research. The purpose statement includes a justification for the study, but there may be missing or unclear information in two of the following domains: (a) the phenomena chosen, (b) the “fit” with a constructivist epistemology and ontology, (c) the relevance of the naturalistic setting or context to the phenomena of interest, (d) the researcher’s relationship to the problem and issues of bias and positionality, and (e) a brief description of the setting and possible sources of data. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 42 (16.8%)
Paper provides a purpose statement, but the information within it is very unclear or is missing altogether in many of of the following domains: (a) the phenomena chosen, (b) the “fit” with a constructivist epistemology and ontology, (c) the relevance of the naturalistic setting or context to the phenomena of interest, (d) the researcher’s relationship to the problem and issues of bias and positionality, and (e) a brief description of the setting and possible sources of data.
Research Question Points Range: 65 (26%) – 75 (30%)
Paper provides a clear, research question that is aligned with the purpose statement. The research question is well developed and includes the key words that clearly identify the phenomenon of interest; the focus of the study (e.g., meaning; experience; culture; stories) and the population and/or location. Points Range: 54 (21.6%) – 64 (25.6%)
Paper provides a research question that approximately aligns with the purpose statement. The research question has some of the key words that identify the phenomenon of interest; the focus of the study (e.g., meaning; experience; culture; stories) and the population and/or location; but some are missing or not qualitative in language or intent. Points Range: 43 (17.2%) – 53 (21.2%)
Paper provides a research question that is unclear and substantively not aligned with the purpose statement. The research question is missing most of the key words that identify the phenomenon of interest; the focus of the study (e.g., meaning; experience; culture; stories) and the population and/or location. The language and intent of the study is not qualitative. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 42 (16.8%)
The paper is either missing the research question; provides a question that is not a research question; or provides a research question that is misdirected or inconsistent with the purpose statement.
Writing Points Range: 20 (8%) – 25 (10%)
Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment. Points Range: 14 (5.6%) – 19 (7.6%)
Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. Points Range: 8 (3.2%) – 13 (5.2%)
Paper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality). Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (2.8%)
Paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.
Annotated Bibliography Points Range: 9 (3.6%) – 10 (4%)
The paper includes an Annotated Bibliography section that includes (a) one literature review or meta-analysis article, (b) one theory article, and (c) one research article. Points Range: 7 (2.8%) – 8 (3.2%)
The paper includes an Annotated Bibliography section, but there may be a misaligned or ill-fitting study in one of the following: (a) one literature review or meta-analysis, (b) one theory article, and (c) one research article. Points Range: 5 (2%) – 6 (2.4%)
The paper includes an Annotated Bibliography section, but there may be a misaligned or ill-fitting study in two of the following: (a) one literature review or meta-analysis, (b) one theory article, and/or (c) one research article. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (1.6%)
The paper includes an Annotated Bibliography section, but there may be a misaligned or ill-fitting study in all of the following (a) one literature review or meta-analysis, (b) one theory article, and (c) one research article.
Form & Style Points Range: 5 (2%) – 5 (2%)
Paper is properly formatted and includes a title page. Points Range: 4 (1.6%) – 4 (1.6%)
Paper includes a title page but there may be one or two minor formatting errors. Points Range: 3 (1.2%) – 3 (1.2%)
Paper includes a title page but there may be several distracting formatting errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (.8%)
Paper is missing a title page
The post Assignment Overview and Guidelines for proper formatting of your paper. Incorporate your Instructor’s feedback from week 4 Parts 1 and 2 submission. Please indicate the new material by highlighting the new or revised text in Parts 1 and 2. appeared first on Ink Essays.
Welcome to originalessaywriters.com, our friendly and experienced essay writers are available 24/7 to complete all your assignments. We offer high-quality academic essays written from scratch to guarantee top grades to all students. All our papers are 100% plagiarism-free and come with a plagiarism report, upon request
Tell Us “Write My Essay for Me” and Relax! You will get an original essay well before your submission deadline.
