Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Note: Our papers are 100% human-written, not AI-generated.
We Write Essays for Students
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper
Get Help Now!
EDUC 750
Applied Article Analysis Grading Rubric
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
| Content 70% | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present |
| Summary: Purpose of study, description of participants/sample, research design, data collection and analysis, results; Identification of whether quantitative and/or qualitative in nature; Idenification as program evaluation or action research | 33 to 35 pointsEach section of the summary is clearly and concisely presented with rationale as to selection for the study, but fully summarized with citations as applicable to include. Correctly identified analysis and research type. | 30 to 32 pointsAll sections of the summary are identified and supported with some rationale and/or citations as applicable. Identified analysis and research type. | 1 to 29 pointsSome sections of the summary are not evident or unclear. Not all information includes citations. May not have identified either analysis and/or research type. | 0 pointsSections are incomplete, missing, lacking alignment, and lacking support. |
| Analysis: Further research, validity, original insight/criticism, implications | 33 to 35 pointsThe analysis provides multiple directions for further research. There is a complete and concise discussion of the validity/rival hypotheses. Insight/Criticism based on fact, research, or scholarly authority. There is a complete and concise discussion of the implications of research on practice. | 30 to 32 pointsThe analysis provides a few directions for further research. There is a concise discussion which generally recognizes most aspects of the validity/rival hypotheses. Generally good evidence given in support of insight/criticism. There is a concise discussion which generally recognizes implications for practice. | 1 to 29 pointsDirections for further research are unclear or inconsistent with findings. The validity/rival hypotheses tend to be one-sided with aspects missing. Evidence only somewhat supports insight/criticism. The discussion contains unclear implications for practice. | 0 pointsThere is an incomplete discussion of further research, validity/rival hypotheses, or implications. Insight/criticism is not entirely supported. No connection is made between research and practice. |
| Structure 30% | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present |
| Grammar, Spelling and Page Count | 14 to 15 pointsCorrect spelling and grammar are used throughout the review. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Must have at least 3 pages. | 13 pointsThere are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Has 3 pages. | 1 to 12 pointsThere are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Has less than 3 pages. | 0 pointsMore than 10 errors that distract the reader from the content. Has only 1 page. |
| Current APA Format Compliance | 14 to 15 pointsThere are 0–1 minor errors in current APA format in the required items. | 13 pointsThere are 2–3 minor errors in current APA format in the required items. | 1 to 12 pointsThere are more than 3 errors in current APA format in the required items. | 0 pointsThere are more than 5 errors in current APA format. |
The post Article Paper appeared first on Essay Mine.
Welcome to originalessaywriters.com, our friendly and experienced essay writers are available 24/7 to complete all your assignments. We offer high-quality academic essays written from scratch to guarantee top grades to all students. All our papers are 100% plagiarism-free and come with a plagiarism report, upon request
Tell Us “Write My Essay for Me” and Relax! You will get an original essay well before your submission deadline.
