LO1 Analyse concepts and theories of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and business ethics
We Write Essays for Students
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper
Get Help Now!LO2 Discuss the relevance of ethical and CSR concepts in organisational contexts
LO3 Differentiate CSR issues from the perspective of different stakeholders
LO4 Evaluate the outcomes of CSR strategies and provide reasoned predictions on the future use of CSR, and ethical perspectives, within organisational policy making
Harvard style
Module code & title | 6BU004 | Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics | |||
Module Learning outcomes: | Tick (Ö)if tested here | ||||
LO1 | Analyse concepts and theories of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and business ethics | Ö | |||
LO2 | Discuss the relevance of ethical and CSR concepts in organisational contexts | Ö | |||
LO3 | Differentiate CSR issues from the perspective of different stakeholders | Ö | |||
LO4 | Evaluate the outcomes of CSR strategies and provide reasoned predictions on the future use of CSR, and ethical perspectives, within organisational policy making | Ö | |||
Assessment types | Weightings (%) | ||||
CASE STUDY. A selection of mini case studies.
|
100% | ||||
Assessment type, weighting and LOs tested by this assessment indicated in the shaded area above by a Ö
Important requirements (Delete where appropriate, if other please provide detail)
Mode of Working: individual
Presentation Format: Mini Case Studies with supporting evidence
Assessment limits (in accordance with UWBS assessment tariff) | In total should be no more than 3,500 words, excluding any attached Appendices/supporting evidence |
Explanation of submission requirements and further guidance
- Assessments are subject to a word limit to ensure consistency of approach across all modules. Your work should not exceed the limit indicated (excluding references and appendices). Do not feel that you have to “achieve” this word count in your work. What is important is that the work satisfies the stated learning outcomes which are articulated through the assessment criteria (see following page).
- Care is taken to ensure that work has been marked correctly. Checks are conducted by both a second lecturer and an independent expert from outside the University on batches of work.
- Your work will not be returned to you but you will receive detailed feedback explaining how your mark has been arrived at and how your work could have been improved upon.
- Always use the Harvard style referencing system.
- Expensive or elaborate bindings and covers for submissions are not required in most instances
- The Business School has a policy of anonymous marking of individual assessments which applies to most modules. You should not identify yourself directly in the work you submit and you may need to use phrases such as “the author of this assignment ….” in the detail of your submission.
Assessment Brief/ Task
The detailed requirements for this task are as follows:
Question 1 – Ethics and Testing of Medicines Case
Animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Many of these experiments cause pain to the animals involved or reduce their quality of life in other ways.
Using this case and theory taught in the module, identify two contrasting ethical theories. Critically analyse how these two theories could be used to argue the case both for and against testing of medicines on animals. You should ensure that you use a range of relevant sources to support your work, including at least two peer-reviewed journal articles.
Question 2 – CSR Theories and Amazon Case Study Amazon is a successful global online company that sells a huge range of goods. However it has been criticised for avoiding paying taxes on a worldwide scale. In Europe it uses a company base in Luxembourg to reduce the amount of tax paid in other European countries and in the US it uses loopholes around having a physical presence in certain states to avoid paying tax there. In 2013 it was reported that in the UK, Amazon paid £2.4m in tax on a total bill of £3.2m for 2012, but received £2.5m in government grants. This was on a reported sales figure of £4.2billion and a turnover of £230m. Amazon’s boss would argue that they are following the legal rules and have therefore done nothing wrong. In 2015 their sales were £5.3billion, with a profit of £34.4m and paid tax of £11.9m. Additionally there have been recent accusations against Amazon regarding their treatment of staff and their employment practices; they have been accused of over-packaging, which is a wider environmental issue; they have been accused of treating some of their suppliers poorly (see weblinks below for further details).
Using this case, identify two theories/models of CSR. Then analyse the level of CSR development that is evidenced by a) Amazon’s policies and statements about ethical and CSR issues and b) Amazon’s activities in regard to paying tax and other business practices such as employment practices, treatment of suppliers and so on. You should use the websites listed below, a range of text books and at least two peer-reviewed journal articles to support your analysis.
Sources for CSR information https://www.csrhub.com/CSR_and_sustainability_information/Amazoncom-Inc http://www.salon.com/2014/02/23/worse_than_wal_mart_amazons_sick_brutality_and_secret_history_of_ruthlessly_intimidating_workers/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-25034598 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/dec/01/week-amazon-insider-feature-treatment-employees-work https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/02/amazon-pay-self-published-authors-per-page-read-kindle
Sources for Amazon Articles on Tax Avoidance used above: http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/commentanalysis/corporatewatch/isittimetoboycottamazon.aspx http://www.theweek.co.uk/business/tax-avoidance/53052/amazon-tax-avoidance-%C2%A33m-tax-%C2%A34bn-uk-sales http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29519631 http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-3139123/Amazon-pays-just-11-9m-tax-5-3bn-worth-UK-sales.html
Question 3 – Stakeholder Issues in The Red Cross and Red Crescent Case Study The Red Cross and the Red Crescent organisations provide humanitarian support to people in vulnerable situations due to war and natural disasters. The organisations also help in providing support to lonely people in European countries not subject to the more publicised stresses from war or natural disaster. You should begin by reading thoroughly the material presented at the websites www.redcross.org.uk and www.icrc.org/en
The Red Cross and Red Crescent organisations operate with respect for a number of unchanging principles. These principles are · Humanity · Impartiality · Neutrality · Independence · Voluntary Service · Unity · Universality
Consider how these principles might work or fail to work in practice. To help you, consider the two developments below:- 1. At a national level, the Finnish Red Cross has been appealing for student volunteers to come forward to help reduce the social isolation of lonely and disadvantaged people. Whilst this is a good intention, it raises the question of the connection between government and voluntary agencies. This role and these activities were previously administered by government using national taxation which is now being taken on by the voluntary sector. We should consider the implications of this change. 2. You can see within the Red Cross website that the John Lewis partnership, a large retailing group in the UK and the insurance company Aviva have joined the Disaster Relief Alliance. This raises a question regarding the role of the private sector in this area and whether there are any moral conflicts present here.
Using this example, identify a range of internal and external stakeholders involved in the organisation and use a stakeholder map to plot their relative importance. Justify your decisions using relevant theory. Evaluate the different expectations four key stakeholders might have in relation to CSR practices, using the information provided in the case study above. Your discussion should include Milton Friedman’s viewpoint and a range of other sources including two peer-reviewed journal articles to support your work.
Question 4 – Personal Case Study Identify a range of future trends in CSR, justifying why you feel these are significant. Then reflect on how these trends will affect organisations in future, and in particular how they might impact on your future in the workplace. You should clearly outline what kind of organisation you would like to work in, and use this as a case to specifically discuss how this would affect you. Remember that as well as working for a multi-national organisation, you could work in the public sector, for a small or medium-sized organisation, for a charity, or set up your own business.
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING POINTS: You will NOT gain marks for simply explaining what an organisation or sector has done. You should ensure that the majority of your answer is used to analyse the information using relevant theories.
Each answer is worth 25% of the final mark and should be approximately 875 words in length. You may fail one question (i.e. a mark below 40%) and still pass the whole assignment IF the overall total achieved a mark of 40% or more.
|
The following information is important when:
- Preparing for your assessment
- Checking your work before you submit it
- Interpreting feedback on your work after marking
Assessment Criteria
The module Learning Outcomes tested by this assessment task are indicated on page 1. The precise criteria against which your work will be marked are as follows:
- Level of research and range of additional material used.
- Reflecting, interpreting and presenting information
- Coherent analysis of ideas presented
- Maturity and precision of writing, grammar and style
Performance descriptors
- Performance descriptors indicate how marks will be arrived at against each of the above criteria. The descriptors indicate the likely characteristics of work that is marked within the percentage bands indicated.
Level 6
% | Work will often demonstrate some of the following features | |
1 | 70-100 | The work varies from very good (70-79%), excellent (80-89%) to outstanding (in excess of 90%). Very good, possibly outstanding or exceptional level of analysis, showing deep critical engagement with a comprehensive range of contextual material. Demonstration of independent thought resulting in creative responses to the assignment brief and some telling insights. Clear evidence of understanding of current scholarship and research based on an extensive range of relevant sources. Clarity of structure demonstrating complete focus of argument. Little or no obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax. Mature links made between relevant ideas, theories and practice. |
2:1 | 60-69 | Clear links between theory and practice. Good coverage of assignment issues. Full understanding of core issues. Evidenced level of understanding of appropriate theory and concepts. Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate |
2:2 | 50-59 | Identifies main issues and relevant theory. Coverage of most of assignment issues. Competent application of relevant theory and states obvious links to practice. Some repeated errors in grammar or syntax possibly failure to apply Harvard referencing standard correctly in places. |
3 | 40-49 | Makes few links between theory and practice. Answers question in a very basic way. Describes relevant theory accurately, and some relevant ideas offered. Possibly failure to apply Harvard referencing standard correctly. Limited coherence of structure. |
Fail | 30-39 | Some learning outcomes and / or assessment criteria not met. Inadequate content with issues not addressed; insufficient evidence of understanding of relevant theory and concepts and only partial understanding shown. Very limited application of theory. Use of extensive quoted passages is evident. Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the student will be able to retrieve the module on resubmission. |
Fail | 0-29 | No learning outcomes fully met. No demonstration of adequate knowledge or understanding of key concepts or theories. There is no recognition of the complexity of the subject. Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice. |
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH LITE ESSAYS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
The post Analyse concepts and theories of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and business ethics LO2 Discuss the relevance of ethical and CSR concepts in organisational contexts LO3 Differentiate CSR issues from the perspective of different stakeholders appeared first on Cheapest Academic Custom Papers.
Welcome to originalessaywriters.com, our friendly and experienced essay writers are available 24/7 to complete all your assignments. We offer high-quality academic essays written from scratch to guarantee top grades to all students. All our papers are 100% plagiarism-free and come with a plagiarism report, upon request
Tell Us “Write My Essay for Me” and Relax! You will get an original essay well before your submission deadline.
