1. Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOCâ€s definition of sexual harassment.
2. Should the intent or motive behind Lewistonâ€s conduct be considered when deciding sexual harassment activities? Explain.

Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Note: Our papers are 100% human-written, not AI-generated. 

Peter Lewiston was terminated on July 15, 2004, by the governing board of the Pine Circle Unified School District (PCUSD) for violation of the districtâ€s sexual harassment policy. Prior to Lewistonâ€s termination he was a senior maintenance employee with an above-average work record who had worked for the PCUSD for eleven years. He had been a widower since 1998 and was described by his co-workers as a friendly, outgoing, but lonely individual. Beverly Gilbury was a fifth-grade teacher working in the districtâ€s Advanced Learning Program. She was 28 years old and married, and had worked for PCUSD for six years. At the time of the incidents, Lewiston and Gilbury both worked at the Simpson Elementary School, where their relationship was described as ?ocooperative.?? The following sequence of events was reported separately by Lewiston and Gilbury during the districtâ€s investigation of this sexual harassment case.