James Madison wanted judges to be involved in assessing the wisdom, justice, and
technical precision of the laws, but only before they were passed. His proposal for a
“Council of Revision” was defeated in the Constitutional Convention, by advocates who
seemed to want the judges involved on far fewer questions about the law, only after a law
was passed. What arguments did both give for their positions? Which argument is better
supported, the one for prior judicial involvement or subsequent judicial review? Why?
We Write Essays for Students
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper
Get Help Now!Sample Solution
The post Constitutional convention. appeared first on ACED ESSAYS.
Welcome to originalessaywriters.com, our friendly and experienced essay writers are available 24/7 to complete all your assignments. We offer high-quality academic essays written from scratch to guarantee top grades to all students. All our papers are 100% plagiarism-free and come with a plagiarism report, upon request
Tell Us “Write My Essay for Me” and Relax! You will get an original essay well before your submission deadline.
